Johnny Damon Is Gone, And I'm Okay With That
Now let it out, slowly.
Let's all calm down for a second and say it together: "Johnny Damon is gone, and I am okay with that, because I am not an enormous tool."
Red Sox fans should remember that Johnny Damon spent six years in Kansas City and a year in Oakland, two cities that have a comparable amount of hatred for the Yankees, and somehow he managed to leave them. It probably had something to do with the substantially larger contract he got by playing in Boston. They should also remember that for $12 million they would probably move to New York, too.
One of the irritating flaws that I see in a lot of Red Sox fans is the cult of personality that crops up around particular players, which seems to go far beyond their contributions on the field. On one hand, this is endearing, because it means even the role players are afforded a level of attention they would never get anywhere else. At the same time, though, it means that those players are automatically assumed to have an allegiance to Boston, and their every move has to be reduced into a scandal-making sound bite. It's as if Us Weekly is in charge of the information that comes out of the Sox clubhouse.
So of course, when Damon signed with the Yankees, instead of being a smart (and predictable) career move for him and an opportunity for Red Sox fans to start questioning the front office's willingness to get into a bidding war with Steinbrenner, it became the next Titanic disaster. Johnny's disloyal. Johnny sold out. Johnny eats babies.
Now, I fully appreciate the struggle to make your team's players appear to be likable guys – I root for a team that employs Barry Bonds – but you really can't expect them to share your preferences. The problem with being a professional athlete is that you lose the ability to root for someone else, because those guys you idolized from afar are now on the same plane as you. As a fan, part of the allure of seeing your team win a championship is that, for you, that victory belongs to more than just those players – it's a victory for the city, for you and your friends, and for everything that the team stands for. But when you're actually sharing in the day-to-day grind of playing pro baseball and someone else is winning, you're just watching your co-workers succeed – and often at your own expense. There's no distance between yourself and the team you grew up with.
Jumping through the hoops it takes to get to the Show is intense. A young player is surrounded by struggles at every level – glad-handing agents, politicized locker rooms, and scouts who actually recommend particular brands of steroids. Chances are he's spent a year or two on a minor league team where half of the guys were about to get cut and go get their electrician's licenses. So when he finally gets out of Amarillo or Shreveport or Des Moines and into the real world, one would expect that the fans would be pretty familiar with the fact that he's learned to look out for himself. But of course, they expect him to remain tight with one city, and to forsake all others at the expense of millions of dollars.
Honestly, if you were a professional athlete, wouldn't that sicken you? Wouldn't the constant evaluation of your "loyalty" to a particular city be a negative? This isn't a huge town. If you're on the Sox, people know where you live; they know what bars you like; they know which BU sorority you frequent. More people know which beer you prefer than the number of seats in the House of Representatives. It's almost as if just because such a huge percentage of people know someone who knows someone who has seen you at Hurricane O'Reilly's, you're a fixture here along with Sam Adams.
Let's say a young pitcher grows up in New Hampshire rooting for the Red Sox, and then he ends up getting drafted by the Dodgers and he has a long and successful career in Los Angeles. Would he like to play for the Sox to fulfill a childhood dream, all other things being equal? Probably. Is he going to put the Red Sox' interests above his own? Of course not, and if he did he would probably end up getting paid well below his market value. The desire to see the Red Sox win changes for him, because the Sox are no longer "the Sox," they're thirty-odd guys he competes against.
Jerry Seinfeld was a little extreme when he said "We don't root for people anymore – we root for laundry." Still, it seems arrogant to tell a guy who spent three years here that he's selling out an entire city. Damon was born in Kansas, and started his career with the Royals. Let's look at things from the opposite direction for a second. Wouldn't it bother you if Joe Sports Fan spent 20 years in the Midwest rooting for the Royals, and then moved here and within two years started cheering for the Sox? Wouldn't you consider his allegiance to Boston kind of a sham? So why do we expect that kind of turnaround out of our professional athletes?
Yes, it's always about the money. However, the very fact that people say that as if it's a negative is beyond me. Every day we make decisions that weigh personal values against financial consequences. Most of us, however, don't have an army of dorks second-guessing us just because other people are emotionally invested in what we do. The fact that Sox fans have had the opportunity to hang around with Johnny Damon for the past three years doesn't mean he has some obligation to them. Sox fans have no right to be outraged because Damon made a decision that was in his best interests, because they're kidding themselves if a) they think he should have ties to Boston that supersede money or b) they think they wouldn't do the same thing. Whether Damon took $12 million or $200 million to go to New York is irrelevant; he evaluated the options and did what was best for him.
There's a great joke that's both applicable to the Damon situation and a universal truth about humanity. A guy walks into a bar and sits down next to a very well-dressed woman, and after a few drinks they strike up a conversation.
The man asks the woman, "Let's say I'd give you a hundred million dollars to sleep with me tonight. Would you take it?"
The well-dressed woman laughs. "Of course, but that's just a hypothetical. We both know there's no way you have a hundred million dollars."
"Okay – how about for fifty bucks?"
The woman gets angry. "Hey, what kind of person do you think I am?"
The man smiles. "Well we already know what kind of person you are – now we're just negotiating the price."
Moral of the story: Of course it's always about the money. But that doesn't mean professional athletes are loyal only to themselves.
It just means we're hypocritical jerkoffs for thinking they shouldn't be.
